It is a fundamental principle that only those who are party to a contract can acquire obligations and rights under it. The common law has developed methods to avoid the harsh application of the principle of ‘privity’ and statute has created a general exception to the doctrine. In this lecture Anne Street explains the doctrine of privity and evaluates the common law and statutory challenges to it.
Issues covered include: Meaning of privity; Problems with privity; the Common Law response – tort, agency, collateral contracts, expanding damages and trusts; The response of Parliament – the Contract (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 – implementation and effect.
Tweddle v Atkinson 1861; White v Jones [1995]; the Eurymedon (New Zealand Shipping v Satterthwaite [1974]); Scruttons v Midland Silicone (1961); Shanklin Pier Ltd v Detel Products Ltd [1951]; Jackson v Horizon Holidays [1975]; Darlington v Wiltshier [1995]; Woodar v Wimpey (1980); Linden Gardens v Lenesta Sludge [1993]; The Albazero [1976]; St Martins v McAlpine [1994]; Panatown v McAlpine [2001]; Nisshin Shipping v Cleaves 2003.
Lecturer: Anne Street
Duration: 30 minutes
Order securely online and get immediate access to the lecture.
More recordings in Contract Law
- Webinar – remedies
- Webinar – consideration
- Misrepresentation – webinar
- Mistake Q&A 2
- Mistake Q&A
- Frustration of contracts
- Regulation of terms
- Misrepresentation
- Mistake
- Implied terms
- Express terms
- Duress and undue influence
- Discharge by breach and incomplete performance
- Privity of contract
- Promissory estoppel
- Consideration
- Offer and acceptance
- Remedies in Contract
- Exemption Clauses Q&A
- Frustration Q&A
- Misrepresentation Q&A
- Consideration Q&A
- Agreement Q&A